Latest Twitter

Subscribe

« Saturation.
» Perspective.

Opinion

Everything Happens For a Reason.

07.08.08 | 9 Comments | 30

Is everything that occurs part of God’s master plan?

- Are children abused for a reason?
- Are women raped for a reason?
- Did 9/11 happen for a reason?

When you put it in these terms, it can certainly be difficult to accept.

Sure. Lose your job? Get in a wreck? Girlfriend break up with you? It’s quite common for someone, in their attempt to console you, to tell you “not to worry,” and that “everything happens for a reason.”

Certainly, it can be comforting to think that somewhere behind your pain, God had his hand in the whole situation and is, as we speak, preparing the ultimate result which will turn out to benefit someone - or further some plan that you did not foresee. And I believe that in many situations, that is the case. I do think that God’s eye is on us (as it is on the sparrow), and that he knows the outcomes of the decisions we make before we even make them. He sees the big picture that we don’t see, and what looks bad to you may have happened for a reason that either a) will benefit you or someone you love in the long run, or b) will further God’s kingdom.

On the other hand, you might wonder, “How could God do this to me?”

In recent years I have come to consider another theory as to why many things happen in this world. I didn’t make it up, by the way, just because I wish it were so. I didn’t fabricate the concept in order to make myself feel better about the evil in the world. On the contrary, there is much to support the idea I am about to describe. I will tell you right now that this belief can either be comforting or very scary depending on your mindset. Plus, it is widely considered heresy.

Imagine for a minute that God knows everything there is to know. He knows the end from the beginning. He knows the ultimate result. He is fully aware of every possible outcome of every decision that anyone might make, and he has the power to influence these decisions in unimaginable ways. But then imagine that God ultimately gives people true free will. Consider the possibility that he has given us the ability to change our outcomes and to make choices that he can not foresee. Does prayer really change things? Does God ever change his mind? I wholeheartedly believe “yes” to both of those questions.  Yet, if God knows conclusively every decision we will make (will I wear blue today? will I turn my air conditioner on 74 or 75?), do we truly have free will?

Opponents to this concept make this argument: Our having free will does not prevent God from knowing every decision we make and every finite detail of every future event. The fact that He knows does not limit our decision-making abilities.

That is the big question. Does God having exhaustive foreknowledge limit the free will of man?

Some say that logic dictates “yes”, while others say that you cannot conform God to our logic. I understand and acknowledge both points.

There is much debate on this topic within modern theology, but this concept is not new. It has been debated since the days of the early church. Many in today’s church are not aware that such an “open” view even exists. The Calvinist view that God does in fact have exhaustive foreknowledge is very predominant in churches today - to the point that any other view sounds completely foreign to us (or it did to me, anyway). I read a book by Greg Boyd (yep - there he is again) called God of the Possible that made a strong case (in my opinion) for a more open view.

Below are some interesting references I pulled from Wikipedia (”Open Theism” entry) that shows God making dynamic decisions based on the decisions of men/women. I trimmed the list down to hit the highlights.

  1. God brought the animals before Adam to see what he would call them. (Gen 2:19)
  2. God is uncertain whether they will eat of the Tree of Life after the fall. (Gen 3:22)
  3. God repents that he made man. (Gen 6:6)
  4. God is prevailed upon by Abraham over whether to spare Sodom. (Gen 18:23-33)
  5. God is moved by the cries of injustice (Exo 2:23-25)
  6. God agrees with Moses that a backup plan should be prepared. (Exo 4:1-9)
  7. God promised those in the Exodus would reach the promise land, but they don’t. (Deut. 1:8; 1:34)
  8. God tells Moses He will destroy Israel, but does not. (Exo 32:7-10; Deut 10:10)
  9. God tells Moses He will not lead them, but He does (Exo 33:3-19)
  10. God wants to destroy Israel again, but is talked out of it (Num 14:11-12)
  11. God repents when his sets up people that lead others astray. (Deut. 32:36)
  12. God promises to drive out the Canaanites, but doesn’t (Josh 3:10; Judg 2:1-3; Judg 3:1-7)
  13. God changes His mind about establishing Eli and his sons forever. (1 Sam 2:30)
  14. God repents over making Saul king. (1 Sam 15:10)
  15. David believes God can change His mind. (2 Sam 12:21-23)
  16. God’s mercy stopped the punishment from completing what He said. (2 Sam 24:16; 2 Chr 21:15)
  17. God is full of compassion. (Ps 78:38-40)
  18. God is limited by man’s decisions (Ps 78:41)
  19. God desires new songs (Ps 33:3; Ps 96:1; Ps 98:1; Ps 144:9; Ps 149:1).
  20. Heed my rebuke demands God, or else (Prov 1:22-27).
  21. Solomon lists chance as a factor in life. (Ecc 9:11)
  22. God tells Hezekiah that he will die, then adds years to his life. (2 Kings 20:1-6)
  23. God declares the future, rather than knowing it. (Isa 46:9-11)
  24. God predicted Israel would repent, but admits He was wrong. (Jer 3:7-10)
  25. Ordaining the sacrificing of children never entered God’s mind (Jer 7:31; Jer 19:5; Jer 32:35)
  26. God gets tired of repenting. (Jer 15:6)
  27. God promises to repent of what He thought to destroy a repenting people. (Jer 18:7-8)
  28. God promises to repent of what He says to promote a backslidden people. (Jer 18:9-10)
  29. God is uncertain if the people will repent if they hear his message. (Jer 26:2-3)
  30. God is uncertain if the people will repent from a written message. (Jer 36:2-3)
  31. God does not willingly bring grief on men. (Lam 3:33)
  32. God despises the fatalistic viewpoint. (Eze 18:2)
  33. God becomes heartbroken. (Hosea 11:8-9)
  34. God sends a drought to influence his people without success (Amos 4:6-11)
  35. Nineveh repents and God refuses to fulfill His prophecy. (Jonah 3:10)
  36. The will of men and the will of God need to coincide. (John 7:17)
  37. Jesus is amazed at the unbelief of Israel. (Mark 6:6)
  38. Jesus marveled at the belief of Gentiles (Luke 7:9)
  39. They could have believed if Satan hadn’t interfered. (Luke 8:12)
  40. Jesus teaches about chance meetings. (Luke 10:31)
  41. Bad things happen without a reason. (Luke 13:2-5)
  42. God wants to destroy Israel, but Jesus convinces God to wait-and-see. (Luke 13:6-9)
  43. Woe! Men are responsible for their own actions. (Luke 17:1)
  44. People can resist the Holy Spirit in their lives (Acts 7:51)
  45. Love is more important to God than a prophecy. (1 Cor 13:1-13)
  46. God changes His mind about keeping the Sabbaths. (Col 2:16)
  47. God does not pick one person over another (Gal 2:6)
  48. Temptation originates apart from God’s decree but from our own will. (James 1:13-15)
  49. There is time in heaven. (Rev 8:1; Rev 6:10; Rev 22:2)

Many say that a concept such as Open Theism does much to limit God and undermine his authority. But supporters disagree. Imagine the might of a God that wants so much to have a relationship with us, that he gives us the ability to reject him. Think of how much more valuable a relationship is if you don’t know every decision the other person will make. Consider how much more prayer means if you know that God really changes his mind based on our petitions. Think of how much more our love might mean to Him knowing that we have the power to freely give it or withold it.

We are in a constant battle in this world. The principalities and powers do much to influence our actions. Our own wills and desires can cause us to do awful things. Is it all part of God’s master plan? Or do people simply make bad decisions that cause bad things? Free will is a two-way street. The same free will that allows people to have a relationship with God also allows people to fly planes into buildings, to abuse, to steal, and to murder.

This is a complex topic, and there’s a lot to it. If you are interested, check out the sites below for supporting and opposing reference materials.

http://www.opentheism.info/

http://www.carm.org/open.htm

http://www.rctr.org/open.htm

http://www.allaboutgod.com/open-theism.htm

Hide All Comments | Add a Comment
 

Leave a reply

  1. Josh commented on July 8, 2008 at 5:08 pm.

    You’re in deep water here, probably over my head.  I just finished a book (Out of Your Comfort Zone: Is Your God Too Nice? by R.T. Kendall) that argued very much the opposite, focusing on the sovereignty of God and basing a lot of his argument on Romans 8 & 9, as well as Ephesians 1 (Paul twice uses the word “predestinate”).  I’m still chewing on all of it.  Great points in your post, though.  I’ll have to check out your references.

  2. Derrick S commented on July 8, 2008 at 5:17 pm.

    Yeah.  I guarantee you it’s over my head.  Really, I just wanted to present the idea.  I don’t have enough knowledge or evidence (who does?) to even form a substantial opinion on it.  But I will say that I do find the idea interesting, and to some extent, plausible.  Thanks for the comment.

  3. Jessica commented on July 9, 2008 at 1:43 am.

    You put a lot of my thoughts into words in this post.  Thanks.  Good to know I’m not the only one who thinks like this. :)

  4. Nate commented on July 9, 2008 at 4:12 pm.

    Oooo…. great post. I’ve often pondered the idea then, along with the idea of the possibility of multi-verses combine to make a very wonderful mind blowing idea.
    Michio Kaku, a theoritical physicist, ponders the multi-verse which is the idea that some where in an alternate universe there is a Nate (me) that decided to not post on this blog today.  The idea behind this is that there is a version of me doing something that is completely than the version in this universe. So, every decision that I make, essentially, creates a different universe. Then multiply that by each person and the various decisions each person makes and you have a ton of universe’s.
    So, when combining the idea of open-theism with the theoritical idea of the multi-verse — it makes sense. My thought on open theism is that God does know every decision but, perhaps, not which decision of all the ones possible that we will make and, if the idea of the multi-verse is true (and many people lean toward the possibility), then it is also possible to allow for the theology of free will alongside the idea of a sovereign God as is held to by the Calvinist sort of folks.
    I would think that there are specific things that would have to happen for the will of God to be accomplished.  The creation of man, the fall of mankind, the birth of Christ, the death of Christ and the redemption of man (in every way possible) to God.  So you have a few points of time (as we know it) that these things happened - but it also allows for the freedom of choice in all other areas.
    Anyway… sorry to have hogged the comment area.

  5. Derrick S commented on July 9, 2008 at 4:37 pm.

    Thanks, Jessica.  Yeah, having that train of thought presented to me gave me a lot to think about.  I don’t really know exactly where I stand, but it has affected the way I visualize things.

  6. Derrick S commented on July 9, 2008 at 4:41 pm.

    Nate:

    That is a very interesting concept.  I have never heard those two ideas combined - at least not that explicitly.  It sort of takes the idea of multiple “decision routes” and makes them into something more tangible.  Interesting.  Certainly over my head ;)

  7. Pingback from There IS a reason for everything … right?

    [...] Read it here - http://www.halfwritings.com/2008/07/everything-happens-for-a-reason/ [...]

  8. Ben Sanders commented on July 9, 2008 at 9:31 pm.

    OK - so you got me started blogging today … I will have to finish my thoughts later.

  9. Derrick S commented on July 10, 2008 at 9:44 am.
    I had a feeling I might hear from you on this one ;) I have read your thoughts so far, and you certainly bring up some good points. I think we do have some different perspectives on things, but I see a lot of overlap as well.
« Saturation.
» Perspective.